Overhead vs. Behind-The-Neck Press, Coaching Depth and Muscle Progress, and Weightlifting and Mind Perform

It’s estimated that there are over 2+ million scientific papers printed annually, and this firehose solely appears to accentuate.
Even in case you slim your focus to health analysis, it might take a number of lifetimes to unravel the hairball of research on vitamin, coaching, supplementation, and associated fields.
This is the reason my workforce and I spend 1000’s of hours annually dissecting and describing scientific research in articles, podcasts, and books and utilizing the outcomes to formulate our 100% all-natural sports activities dietary supplements and inform our teaching providers.
And whereas the rules of correct consuming and exercising are easy and considerably immutable, reviewing new analysis can reinforce or reshape how we eat, prepare, and dwell for the higher.
Thus, every week, I’m going to share three scientific research on eating regimen, train, supplementation, mindset, and way of life that may assist you acquire muscle and energy, lose fats, carry out and really feel higher, dwell longer, and get and keep more healthy.
This week, you’ll be taught the easiest way to coach all three heads of your delts, a standard drawback that stops many individuals from constructing muscle, and whether or not weightlifting makes you smarter.
Is the behind-the-neck press the reply to well-developed delts?
Supply: “Front vs Back and Barbell vs Machine Overhead Press: An Electromyographic Analysis and Implications For Resistance Training” printed on July 22, 2022 in Frontiers in Physiology.
If you wish to maximize your upper-body aesthetics, you want spherical, proportional shoulders.
And the overhead press is without doubt one of the finest workout routines for constructing your shoulders … no less than half of your shoulders.
The issue is that when your shoulder coaching primarily consists of overhead urgent, your “entrance delts” will develop properly, however your facet and rear delts might lag a little bit.
This begs the query: is there a greater technique to press that trains prepare all three heads of the delts extra uniformly?
Scientists on the College of Milan endeavored to seek out out with this study.
That they had eight aggressive male bodybuilders do one set every of the seated barbell overhead press, seated behind-the-neck barbell press, seated machine overhead press, and seated machine behind-the-neck press. Throughout every train, the researchers measured muscle activation in every head of the delts and the pecs, traps, and triceps.
The outcomes confirmed that the traps and triceps have been equally lively no matter train and that the pecs have been barely extra lively in the course of the overhead press variations than the behind-the-neck press variations.
Relating to shoulder activation, the entrance delts have been equally lively throughout all workout routines, however the facet and rear delts have been considerably extra lively in the course of the behind-the-neck barbell press than within the different workout routines.
Listed here are these ends in graph kind:
At first studying, many individuals will take this to imply the behind-the-neck press is superior to the overhead press for growing your shoulders, however I’m not satisfied for just a few causes.
First, most individuals discover the behind-the-neck press uncomfortable as a result of it calls for a level of shoulder mobility that almost all of individuals lack. Even for these with satisfactory shoulder mobility, it often requires that you simply jut your head ahead to keep away from knocking your noggin, making it an ungainly place to press from.
Second, to carry out the behind-the-neck press, it’s a must to put your shoulders into the so-called “high-five” place (higher arm out to the facet along with your elbow bent at 90 levels and your palm going through ahead). Research shows that this place is inherently much less steady on your shoulders than while you deliver your elbows ahead, which will increase your threat of shoulder harm.
And third, to compensate for the uncomfortable urgent place and elevated harm threat, the behind-the-neck press forces you to make use of lighter weights than you may ordinarily press, limiting the train’s muscle- and strength-building potential.
By my lights, a greater method to constructing proportional shoulders is to make the overhead press (seated, standing, or each) the main focus of your shoulder coaching. It lets you prepare your shoulders (and a number of other different upper-body muscle teams) with heavy weights safely and progress often, making it excellent for gaining muscle and energy, and is comfy for most individuals.
Then spherical out your shoulder improvement with isolation workout routines for the facet and rear delts, such because the cable and dumbbell facet lateral elevate, dumbbell rear lateral elevate, barbell rear delt row, and machine reverse fly.
Or, in case you have restricted time to coach and wish to maximize your shoulder improvement with one train, I’d select the dumbbell shoulder press. This variation lets you undertake an analogous place to the behind-the-neck press, which ought to prepare your facet and rear delts greater than barbell urgent. Nevertheless, since you use dumbbells, your arms and shoulders can transfer extra freely, permitting you to discover a protected, steady, and comfy place.
That is how I personally like to arrange my coaching, and it’s just like the strategy I advocate in my health books for women and men, Greater Leaner Stronger and Thinner Leaner Stronger.
(And in case you’d like much more particular recommendation about how it’s best to manage your coaching to succeed in your well being and health objectives, take the Legion Energy Coaching Quiz, and in lower than a minute, you’ll know the proper energy coaching program for you. Click on right here to test it out.)
TL;DR: The behind-the-neck press might prepare your facet and rear delts greater than the overhead press, nevertheless it forces you into an uncomfortable and compromised place, limiting its muscle- and strength-building potential.
Lifting weights however not constructing muscle? You’re most likely not coaching onerous sufficient.
Supply: “Are Trainees Lifting Heavy Enough? Self-Selected Loads in Resistance Exercise: A Scoping Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis” printed on July 5, 2022 in Sports activities Drugs (Auckland N.Z.).
Many weightlifters really feel like they bust a intestine within the health club however don’t see the progress they imagine they deserve.
If so for you, a latest meta-analysis performed by scientists at Solent College would possibly clarify why.
The researchers parsed the scientific literature and located 18 appropriate research inspecting how onerous folks habitually prepare.
In most of those research, the researchers requested folks to carry out 3 units of 10 reps of an train (a pair used decrease rep ranges or requested the weightlifters to do as many units and reps as they needed).
Nevertheless, earlier than doing the train, the researchers requested the folks to self-select the burden they have been going to make use of. The one stipulation was that the folks had to decide on a weight that might make the units difficult.
For instance, in a single study, the researchers requested weightlifters to pick out weights that they thought would make doing 3 units of 10 reps of the bench press, leg press, and biceps curl troublesome.
The outcomes confirmed that when most individuals are left to their very own gadgets, they choose a weight that’s equal to ~53% of their one-rep max for a set of 10 reps (keep in mind that most individuals can carry out 10 reps of an train with ~75% of their one-rep max). This held true no matter expertise, age, intercourse, the timing of the one-rep max take a look at, and the muscle group being skilled.
The researchers additionally discovered that when folks carried out a number of units, they tended to decide on barely heavier weights set-to-set and that they tended to pick out marginally heavier weights when doing lower-rep units.
When the scientists scrutinized the information additional, they discovered that individuals usually used progressively heavier weights over time after they skilled in decrease rep ranges (<10 reps per set) however progressed extra cautiously after they skilled in increased rep ranges (>10 reps per set). In addition they observed that when folks choose their rep targets, they often go away 6-to-7 reps in reserve on the finish of every set. This was significantly true throughout high-rep coaching.
In different phrases, most individuals most likely don’t carry heavy sufficient weights to maximise their progress within the health club.
You don’t have to coach all the way in which to failure to construct muscle—stopping 1-to-3 reps shy is often enough. These outcomes present, nonetheless, that when most individuals do units of 10 reps, they go away ~10 reps within the tank, which suggests they don’t push themselves practically onerous sufficient if their aim is to construct muscle.
How are you going to keep away from sandbagging your exercises?
First, goal to finish all of your units 1-to-3 reps shy of failure. To make sure you’re doing that, ask your self this query on the finish of every set, simply earlier than re-racking the burden: “If I completely needed to, what number of extra reps might I get with good kind?”
If the reply is greater than two, enhance the burden or reps to make your subsequent set tougher. If the reply is one or zero, cut back the burden or reps to make your subsequent set much less difficult.
When you’re glad that you simply’re coaching shut sufficient to failure, make sure you proceed progressing by implementing double development. Do that by rising the burden you employ for an train when you hit the highest of your rep vary for one set.
TL:DR: Most individuals choose weights which might be too gentle and do too few reps to maximise muscle progress. Don’t make the identical mistake.
Weightlifting might make you smarter.
Supply: “Effects of Acute Resistance Exercise on Executive Function: A Systematic Review of the Moderating Role of Intensity and Executive Function Domain” printed on December 8, 2022 in Sports activities Drugs.
The obvious good thing about train is that it improves your bodily well being, however an increasing number of analysis reveals it’s additionally good on your mind well being.
Particularly, there’s a rising physique of proof that it improves govt operate (EF), which refers to a gaggle of psychological abilities that allow you to regulate your ideas, feelings, consideration, and behaviors.
EF has three core domains:
- Inhibitory management, which is your capacity to make choices with out tendencies or exterior distractions affecting your judgment.
- Working reminiscence, which is your capacity to retailer or replace beforehand saved data in response to the calls for of the duty you’re doing.
- Cognitive flexibility, which is your capacity to make use of inhibitory management and dealing reminiscence to change your perspective and method to a scenario.
Utilizing these abilities adeptly helps you construct sturdy relationships, excel academically and professionally, and avoid psychological and bodily decline as you age. In different phrases, boosting EF is a technique to enhance your high quality of life dramatically.
To additional our understanding of how weightlifting impacts EF and attempt to puzzle out how onerous you might want to prepare to spice up EF, researchers at Nationwide Taiwan Regular College performed a systematic review of 19 research investigating 42 separate “outcomes” (the analysis measured a complete of 42 totally different information factors, mainly).
Total, weightlifting positively affected EF for 57% of the outcomes measured, ~43% confirmed it didn’t have an effect on EF, and no research confirmed it had a detrimental impact on EF.
When it comes to depth, moderate-intensity weightlifting benefitted EF most constantly (~72% of the outcomes studied confirmed a constructive impact), adopted by low-intensity ~(57%), then high-intensity weightlifting (~41%).
Weightlifting boosted inhibitory management most often (~65% of the outcomes studied confirmed a constructive impact). Comparatively, ~44% and 50% of the research reported constructive outcomes on working reminiscence and cognitive flexibility, respectively.
In different phrases, the outcomes confirmed that weightlifting most likely advantages EF (particularly inhibitory management), and moderate-intensity weightlifting probably confers essentially the most advantages.
This would possibly make you suppose you might want to take a reasonable method to weightlifting if you wish to enhance mind energy (no “pump coaching” or low-rep units, for instance), however I doubt that’s the case.
In a 2019 meta-analysis performed by scientists at Goethe College Frankfurt, researchers once more discovered that weightlifting positively impacts EF, although they discovered that low- and high-intensity coaching was the simplest and moderate-intensity weightlifting was bootless on this regard.
The distinction between these research was that every measured weightlifting’s impact on EF in a different way—they included various kinds of research, used totally different testing strategies and time scales, and so forth.
With that in thoughts, all forms of weightlifting appear more likely to profit EF. If a examine suggests in any other case, it’s most likely extra of a mirrored image on how the researchers designed their evaluation quite than a knock on anyone kind of coaching.
One other vital level when decoding these outcomes is that they check with the “acute” results of weightlifting on EF. That’s, they present that weightlifting boosts cognitive operate shortly after coaching, not that it improves EF long run.
Thus, if you wish to harness the brain-boosting advantages of weightlifting, it is sensible to schedule your exercises within the morning, earlier than work or class, or shortly earlier than you do one thing that requires your full consideration (an examination or an vital assembly, for instance). Although it stands to motive train would additionally enhance long-term mind operate, this isn’t as effectively established.
TL;DR: Weightlifting probably improves govt operate for a short time after coaching.
+ Scientific References
- Coratella, G., Tornatore, G., Longo, S., Esposito, F., & Cè, E. (2022). Front vs Back and Barbell vs Machine Overhead Press: An Electromyographic Analysis and Implications For Resistance Training. Frontiers in Physiology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPHYS.2022.825880
- Kolber, M. J., Beekhuizen, K. S., Cheng, M. S. S., & Hellman, M. A. (2010). Shoulder injuries attributed to resistance training: A brief review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(6), 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0B013E3181DC4330
- Kolber, M. J., Corrao, M., & Hanney, W. J. (2013). Characteristics of anterior shoulder instability and hyperlaxity in the weight-training population. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(5), 1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0B013E318269F776
- Steele, J., Malleron, T., Har-Nir, I., Androulakis-Korakakis, P., Wolf, M., Fisher, J. P., & Halperin, I. (2022). Are Trainees Lifting Heavy Enough? Self-Selected Loads in Resistance Exercise: A Scoping Review and Exploratory Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 52(12), 2909–2923. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40279-022-01717-9
- Alves, R. C., Prestes, J., Souza-Junior, T. P., & Follador, L. (n.d.). (PDF) Acute Effect of Weight Training at a Self-Selected Intensity on Affective Responses in Obese Adolescents. Retrieved March 2, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270506207_Acute_Effect_of_Weight_Training_at_a_Self-Selected_Intensity_on_Affective_Responses_in_Obese_Adolescents
- TY, H., FT, C., RH, L., CH, H., TL, C., CH, C., TM, H., & YK, C. (2022). Effects of Acute Resistance Exercise on Executive Function: A Systematic Review of the Moderating Role of Intensity and Executive Function Domain. Sports Medicine – Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40798-022-00527-7
- Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-113011-143750
- Zelazo, P. D. (2015). Executive function: Reflection, iterative reprocessing, complexity, and the developing brain. Developmental Review, 38, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DR.2015.07.001
- Reimann, Z., Miller, J. R., Dahle, K. M., Hooper, A. P., Young, A. M., Goates, M. C., Magnusson, B. M., & Crandall, A. A. (2020). Executive functions and health behaviors associated with the leading causes of death in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318800829
- Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/37.4.433
- TY, H., FT, C., RH, L., CH, H., TL, C., CH, C., TM, H., & YK, C. (2022). Effects of Acute Resistance Exercise on Executive Function: A Systematic Review of the Moderating Role of Intensity and Executive Function Domain. Sports Medicine – Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40798-022-00527-7
- Wilke, J., Giesche, F., Klier, K., Vogt, L., Herrmann, E., & Banzer, W. (2019). Acute Effects of Resistance Exercise on Cognitive Function in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 49(6), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40279-019-01085-X